Research and Articles
Hotline
- Capital Markets Hotline
- Companies Act Series
- Climate Change Related Legal Issues
- Competition Law Hotline
- Corpsec Hotline
- Court Corner
- Cross Examination
- Deal Destination
- Debt Funding in India Series
- Dispute Resolution Hotline
- Education Sector Hotline
- FEMA Hotline
- Financial Service Update
- Food & Beverages Hotline
- Funds Hotline
- Gaming Law Wrap
- GIFT City Express
- Green Hotline
- HR Law Hotline
- iCe Hotline
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Hotline
- International Trade Hotlines
- Investment Funds: Monthly Digest
- IP Hotline
- IP Lab
- Legal Update
- Lit Corner
- M&A Disputes Series
- M&A Hotline
- M&A Interactive
- Media Hotline
- New Publication
- Other Hotline
- Pharma & Healthcare Update
- Press Release
- Private Client Wrap
- Private Debt Hotline
- Private Equity Corner
- Real Estate Update
- Realty Check
- Regulatory Digest
- Regulatory Hotline
- Renewable Corner
- SEZ Hotline
- Social Sector Hotline
- Tax Hotline
- Technology & Tax Series
- Technology Law Analysis
- Telecom Hotline
- The Startups Series
- White Collar and Investigations Practice
- Yes, Governance Matters.
- Japan Desk ジャパンデスク
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Hotline
July 7, 2022Supreme Court Rules on Commercial Wisdom of Creditors to Allow Withdrawal of Insolvency Proceedings
This article was originally published by IBC Laws on July 02, 2022.
INTRODUCTION
In Vallal RCK v M/s Siva Industries & Anr. (2022) ibclaw.in 63 SC, the Supreme Court (“SC”) has once again given precedence to the commercial wisdom of the committee of creditors (“CoC”). The issue before the SC was whether the Adjudicating Authority could interfere with the CoC’s decision to allow withdrawal of insolvency proceedings on the basis of a settlement plan. The SC held that the adjudicating authority, while deciding an application under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (“Code”), cannot review the merits of a settlement plan approved by the CoC.
For complete article, please click here.
– Adimesh Lochan, Arjun Gupta & Sahil Kanuga
(The authors would like to thank Aryan Sharma (Student, Institute of Law, Nirma University) for his contribution.)
You can direct your queries or comments to the authors