Telcos can now trade in spectrum
From a consumer’s perspective, these regulations could improve the quality of mobile network service and lead to cheaper tariffs.
Efficient utilization is possibly the first step towards preserving scarce resources.1 Spectrum has traditionally been subject to tight regulatory controls. However with the changing economic milieu, the speed of technological innovation and increasing market demands, there has been a requirement to lessen government control and let market forces determine spectrum utilization.
Considering, the economic worth of spectrum, the introduction of much awaited Guidelines for Trading of Access Spectrum by Access Service Providers, on 12th October, 2015 (“Spectrum Trading Guidelines” or “Guidelines”) is the latest in a series of reforms being introduced by the Government.
The Department of Telecom, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (“DoT”) released the Spectrum Trading Guidelines close on the heels of the Guidelines for Sharing of Access Spectrum by Access Service Providers (“Spectrum Sharing Guidelines”). The Spectrum Sharing Guidelines allow the sharing of spectrum between two licensees subject to the condition that two independent networks are provided in the band. These developments, coupled with the Guidelines for Transfer/Merger of various categories of Telecommunication service licences/authorisation under Unified Licence on compromises, arrangements and amalgamation of the companies (“M&A Guidelines”) should give a much needed boost to consolidation in the highly fragmented Indian telecom market.
Until 2013, the Telecom Regulator, i.e. the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (“TRAI”) was of the view that it was pre-mature to introduce spectrum sharing or spectrum trading guidelines. The TRAI in its recommendations on ‘Spectrum Management and Licensing Framework’ in 2010 as well as its recommendations on ‘Auction of Spectrum’ in 2012 had observed that in countries where spectrum trading was permitted, the spectrum is normally assigned through a market mechanism. However, in India except for 3G/BWA spectrum (which was auctioned), all other spectrum available with the operators had been obtained administratively without paying its market price.2 As such since spectrum, has traditionally been assigned on a “right to use” basis for a fixed period to the service provider therefore licensee has no ownership right to enable it to ‘trade’ in it.
However, in light of the fact that the Government had decided that all spectrum holders will have to a pay one-time charge at a market-determined price for their existing spectrum held beyond 4.4 MHz/2.5MHz for GSM/CDMA license holders and thereby putting them on an equal footing with those holding auctioned spectrum, the TRAI in its 2013 recommendation on Valuation and Reserve Price of Spectrum suggested that spectrum trading should be permitted.
This recommendation was in line with the Government’s National Telecom Policy, 2012 (“NTP”), which anticipated the need to incorporate greater flexibility in spectrum management and envisaged the following:
“To move at the earliest towards liberalization of spectrum to enable use of spectrum in any band to provide any service in any technology as well as to permit spectrum pooling, sharing and later, trading to enable optimal utilization of spectrum through appropriate regulatory framework.”
We now take a look at the key aspects of the Spectrum Trading Guidelines.
Salient Features of the Spectrum Trading Guidelines
India’s mobile service space remains fragmented compared to international markets, however these guidelines along with the recent M&A Guidelines on Spectrum could be a move that will be beneficial for the bigger market players as they seek to consolidate their presence by acquiring spectrum from smaller companies. From a consumer’s perspective, these regulations could bring about a major change as it could improve the quality of service in terms of call drops which the TRAI has been aggressively trying to address over the last few months4, with the possibility also of better/new services being available to consumers at cheaper tariffs which could in turn also provide an incentive for innovation.
Since consolidation has been long overdue in this sector, it would be interesting to see if the Spectrum Trading Guidelines and Spectrum Sharing Guidelines eventually end up adversely affecting competition in the market. While the issue of possible anti-competitive conduct through consolidation/hoarding of spectrum or through a mandate precluding the newcomers from providing service by buying out the spectrum necessary for such services was recognized by the TRAI in its 2010 Recommendations on ‘Spectrum Management and Licensing Framework’.5 However, the Spectrum Trading Guidelines do not seem to specifically address this possibility. Nevertheless, the antitrust regulator, i.e. the Competition Commission of India is now expected to look at such arrangements / deals in detail. Therefore, spectrum trading or sharing transactions would need to be structured to also ensure compliance with competition laws.
– Aditya Kutty, Kartik Maheshwari, Rakhi Jindal & Vivek Kathpalia
You can direct your queries or comments to the authors
1 “Spectrum has been internationally accepted as a scarce, finite and renewable natural resource which is susceptible to degradation in case of inefficient utilization”. - para 64 of the judgment by the Supreme Court in WP No. 423/2010 and 10/2010
2 ‘Recommendations on the Working Guidelines For Spectrum Trading’ available at http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/Recommendation/Documents/Recommendations_Final-28012014.pdf
5 TRAI recommendations on “Spectrum Management and Licensing Framework”, 11th May, 2010 available at http://www.trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/Recommendation/Documents/FINALRECOMENDATIONS952012.pdf