Dispute Resolution Hotline
October 22, 2024
Arbitrability of Disputes arising post Discharge of Contract by Accord & Satisfaction

This article was first published in ibclaw.blog (October 17, 2024).


The Indian Supreme Court (“SC”) has affirmed the limited scope of pre-referral jurisdiction of courts in an application for appointment of an arbitrator. Such jurisdiction does not extend to an examination of whether a contract has been discharged by “accord and satisfaction”. While the court may consider whether the application under Section 11 has been filed within the limitation period, it must not delve into the issue of whether underlying claims are time barred.

Please click here for our detailed article.

 

Authors

Shruti DhondeAdimesh Lochan and Arjun Gupta

You can direct your queries or comments to the relevant member.


Disclaimer

The contents of this hotline should not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer.

This Hotline provides general information existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is intended as a news update and Nishith Desai Associates neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on the specific facts and circumstances. This Hotline does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements.

This is not a Spam mail. You have received this mail because you have either requested for it or someone must have suggested your name. Since India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive, which states that a mail cannot be considered Spam if it contains the sender's contact information, which this mail does. In case this mail doesn't concern you, please unsubscribe from mailing list.


Dispute Resolution Hotline

October 22, 2024

Arbitrability of Disputes arising post Discharge of Contract by Accord & Satisfaction


This article was first published in ibclaw.blog (October 17, 2024).


The Indian Supreme Court (“SC”) has affirmed the limited scope of pre-referral jurisdiction of courts in an application for appointment of an arbitrator. Such jurisdiction does not extend to an examination of whether a contract has been discharged by “accord and satisfaction”. While the court may consider whether the application under Section 11 has been filed within the limitation period, it must not delve into the issue of whether underlying claims are time barred.

Please click here for our detailed article.

 

Authors

Shruti DhondeAdimesh Lochan and Arjun Gupta

You can direct your queries or comments to the relevant member.


Disclaimer

The contents of this hotline should not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer.

This Hotline provides general information existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is intended as a news update and Nishith Desai Associates neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on the specific facts and circumstances. This Hotline does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements.

This is not a Spam mail. You have received this mail because you have either requested for it or someone must have suggested your name. Since India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive, which states that a mail cannot be considered Spam if it contains the sender's contact information, which this mail does. In case this mail doesn't concern you, please unsubscribe from mailing list.