Research and Articles
Hotline
- Capital Markets Hotline
- Companies Act Series
- Climate Change Related Legal Issues
- Competition Law Hotline
- Corpsec Hotline
- Court Corner
- Cross Examination
- Deal Destination
- Debt Funding in India Series
- Dispute Resolution Hotline
- Education Sector Hotline
- FEMA Hotline
- Financial Service Update
- Food & Beverages Hotline
- Funds Hotline
- Gaming Law Wrap
- GIFT City Express
- Green Hotline
- HR Law Hotline
- iCe Hotline
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Hotline
- International Trade Hotlines
- Investment Funds: Monthly Digest
- IP Hotline
- IP Lab
- Legal Update
- Lit Corner
- M&A Disputes Series
- M&A Hotline
- M&A Interactive
- Media Hotline
- New Publication
- Other Hotline
- Pharma & Healthcare Update
- Press Release
- Private Client Wrap
- Private Debt Hotline
- Private Equity Corner
- Real Estate Update
- Realty Check
- Regulatory Digest
- Regulatory Hotline
- Renewable Corner
- SEZ Hotline
- Social Sector Hotline
- Tax Hotline
- Technology & Tax Series
- Technology Law Analysis
- Telecom Hotline
- The Startups Series
- White Collar and Investigations Practice
- Yes, Governance Matters.
- Japan Desk ジャパンデスク
Dispute Resolution Hotline
October 22, 2024Arbitrability of Disputes arising post Discharge of Contract by Accord & Satisfaction
This article was first published in ibclaw.blog (October 17, 2024).
The Indian Supreme Court (“SC”) has affirmed the limited scope of pre-referral jurisdiction of courts in an application for appointment of an arbitrator. Such jurisdiction does not extend to an examination of whether a contract has been discharged by “accord and satisfaction”. While the court may consider whether the application under Section 11 has been filed within the limitation period, it must not delve into the issue of whether underlying claims are time barred.
Please click here for our detailed article.
Authors
- Shruti Dhonde, Adimesh Lochan and Arjun Gupta
You can direct your queries or comments to the relevant member.