Research and Articles
![](/Content/images/arrow-3-right-red.png)
Hotline
![](/Content/images/arrow-3-right-red.png)
- Capital Markets Hotline
- Companies Act Series
- Climate Change Related Legal Issues
- Competition Law Hotline
- Corpsec Hotline
- Court Corner
- Cross Examination
- Deal Destination
- Debt Funding in India Series
- Deal Talk
- Dispute Resolution Hotline
- Education Sector Hotline
- FEMA Hotline
- Financial Service Update
- Food & Beverages Hotline
- Funds Hotline
- Gaming Law Wrap
- GIFT City Express
- Green Hotline
- HR Law Hotline
- iCe Hotline
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Hotline
- International Trade Hotlines
- Investment Funds: Monthly Digest
- IP Hotline
- IP Lab
- Legal Update
- Lit Corner
- M&A Disputes Series
- M&A Hotline
- M&A Interactive
- Media Hotline
- New Publication
- Other Hotline
- Pharma & Healthcare Update
- Press Release
- Private Client Wrap
- Private Debt Hotline
- Private Equity Corner
- Real Estate Update
- Realty Check
- Regulatory Digest
- Regulatory Hotline
- Renewable Corner
- SEZ Hotline
- Social Sector Hotline
- Tax Hotline
- Technology & Tax Series
- Technology Law Analysis
- Telecom Hotline
- The Startups Series
- White Collar and Investigations Practice
- Yes, Governance Matters.
- Japan Desk ジャパンデスク
Tax Hotline
June 1, 2002India- Mauritius taxation treaty circular quashed by the Delhi High Court
In a surprise decision delivered by the Delhi High Court (HC), allowing two public interest litigations (PIL) challenging the circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes dated April 13, 2000 (Circular), the HC has quashed the Circular.
The Circular had clarified that Foreign Institutional Investors (FII) resident in Mauritius, which were issued a "Certificate of Residence" by the Mauritian Authorities, would constitute sufficient evidence for accepting the status of residence as well as beneficial ownership for applying the India - Mauritius taxation treaty.
It must be noted that in November 2000, the HC had refused to stay operation of the Circular and had clearly stated that if the PILs were allowed, the Mauritius resident FIIs involved in treaty shopping would have to pay tax with retrospective effect from April 13, 2000.
The Government of India is expected to appeal against this order to the Supreme Court of India. And Mauritius resident FIIs may also intervene.
While this tax hotline is based on press reports, we are awaiting the actual text of the judgment for further analysis.
Nishith Desai & Shefali Goradia
Source : The Economic Times dated June 1, 2002