Research and Articles
![](/Content/images/arrow-3-right-red.png)
Hotline
![](/Content/images/arrow-3-right-red.png)
- Capital Markets Hotline
- Companies Act Series
- Climate Change Related Legal Issues
- Competition Law Hotline
- Corpsec Hotline
- Court Corner
- Cross Examination
- Deal Destination
- Debt Funding in India Series
- Deal Talk
- Dispute Resolution Hotline
- Education Sector Hotline
- FEMA Hotline
- Financial Service Update
- Food & Beverages Hotline
- Funds Hotline
- Gaming Law Wrap
- GIFT City Express
- Green Hotline
- HR Law Hotline
- iCe Hotline
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Hotline
- International Trade Hotlines
- Investment Funds: Monthly Digest
- IP Hotline
- IP Lab
- Legal Update
- Lit Corner
- M&A Disputes Series
- M&A Hotline
- M&A Interactive
- Media Hotline
- New Publication
- Other Hotline
- Pharma & Healthcare Update
- Press Release
- Private Client Wrap
- Private Debt Hotline
- Private Equity Corner
- Real Estate Update
- Realty Check
- Regulatory Digest
- Regulatory Hotline
- Renewable Corner
- SEZ Hotline
- Social Sector Hotline
- Tax Hotline
- Technology & Tax Series
- Technology Law Analysis
- Telecom Hotline
- The Startups Series
- White Collar and Investigations Practice
- Yes, Governance Matters.
- Japan Desk ジャパンデスク
Telecom Hotline
August 6, 2006'IPTV Out Of The Cable TV Act' - TRAI Proposes
The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India ("TRAI") has put forth a proposal that Internet Protocol Television ("IPTV") should be regulated under the existing telecom licences, so as to facilitate its growth in the country.
IPTV
IPTV is a system where a digital television service is delivered over a broadband connection instead of the traditional way of transmitting through a cable network.
TRAI has noted that certain problems are likely to arise if IPTV is to be governed under the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 ("Cable Act"). This is because IPTV services were not conceived at the time of enactment of the Cable Act, which aimed to regulate the conventional cable TV system. Some of the problems likely to arise if IPTV is brought within the scope of the Cable Act are as follows.
- Section 4A of Cable Act provides that in the transmission of free-to-air channels, an addressable system should not be a pre-requisite. However, technological requirement of IPTV to deliver content through a Set Top Box ("STB") could lead to non-compliance of Section 4A.
- Use of different protocols by different companies and lack of standardization for IPTV services would violate the requirement of Section 9 of Cable Act, which requires the use of equipment conforming to Indian Standards.
- TRAI has also proposed to hold the telecom operators liable for regulation of content by way of requirement of compliance with the Programme Code and the Advertising Code.
Implementation of this proposal could cause a major setback to the television broadcasters who have all along been demanding keeping IPTV within the ambit of the Cable TV Act. It also implies that telecom operators would be able to freely offer IPTV using their broadband network and on the basis of the telecom licenses that they currently hold.
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT
Moreover, in the context of the above issues there may be a need to revisit the FDI norms that may be applicable for entities providing IPTV services, as currently FDI is only prescribed in respect of cable TV services (49 %) and telecom service operators (74%), subject to certain regulations.
APPLICABILITY OF OTHER GUIDELINES
Also, the relationship between Downlinking and Uplinking Guidelines and the IPTV service provider would need clarity. Currently, the regulations are constrictive to the extent that they prohibit cable operators/DTH providers from carrying unregistered TV Channels, while they are silent on service providers who provide TV channels through other mediums such as IPTV.
Comments on TRAI's proposed amendments have been invited from all stakeholders by June 23, 2006.
IMPLICATIONS
IPTV may be one of the first instances in India of voice, video and data being provided on a single network and on a large scale. This in turn leads to convergence of telecom and entertainment services, thereby raising the need for a new regulatory framework which holds no rigid distinction between telecom service providers and television/entertainment service providers.
India proposed a Convergence Bill in the year 2000, which attempted to address the issues of regulating converged telecom and entertainment services. However, till date the Bill awaits enactment.