NISHITH.TV
  • Mumbai
  • Silicon Valley
  • Bengaluru
  • Singapore
  • Mumbai BKC
  • New Delhi
  • Munich
  • New York

Locations

  • Mumbai
  • Silicon Valley
  • Bengaluru
  • Singapore
  • Mumbai BKC
  • New Delhi
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Content
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • NDA in the Media
  • Areas of Service
  • Research and Articles
  • Opportunities
  • Contact
  • NDACloud
  • Client Access
  • Member Access
  • Events and Calender
  • How we perform
  • Knowledge anywhere, anytime
  • See our recent deals
  • Up to date legal developments
  • Case studies in M&A

Research and Articles

HTMLPDF

  • Research at NDA
  • Research Papers
  • Research Articles
  • NDA Think Tanks
  • NDA Hotline
  • New Ali Gunjan
  • Japan Desk ジャパンデスク

NDA-Hotline


  • Debt Funding in India Series
  • Private Equity Corner
  • The Startups Series
  • Court Corner
  • Investment Funds: Monthly Digest
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Hotline
  • Deal Destination
  • New Publication
  • M&A Interactive
  • Lit Corner
  • Private Debt Hotline
  • Food & Beverages Hotline
  • Companies Act Series
  • Gaming Law Wrap
  • Private Client Wrap
  • GIFT City Express
  • Regulatory Hotline
  • Capital Markets Hotline
  • Tax Hotline
  • Corpsec Hotline
  • Dispute Resolution Hotline
  • M&A Hotline
  • Pharma & Healthcare Update
  • Competition Law Hotline
  • HR Law Hotline
  • IP Hotline
  • Telecom Hotline
  • FEMA Hotline
  • Social Sector Hotline
  • iCe Hotline
  • SEZ Hotline
  • Media Hotline
  • Funds Hotline
  • Education Sector Hotline
  • International Trade Hotlines
  • Other Hotline
  • Real Estate Update
  • Realty Check
  • White Collar and Investigations Practice
  • Legal Update
  • IP Lab
  • Cross Examination
  • Technology & Tax Series
  • Technology Law Analysis
  • Yes, Governance Matters.
  • Financial Service Update
  • Japan Desk ジャパンデスク

Capital Markets Hotline

July 22, 2009

No more superior rights in Listed Companies

On July 21, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) issued a letter addressed to the stock exchanges, directing them to amend provisions of the Equity Listing Agreement (“Listing Agreement”).  The amendment is to include a clause that provides that the issuer (company) shall not issue shares in any manner which may confer on any person, superior rights as to voting or dividend vis-à-vis the rights on equity shares that are already listed.

 

Background

 

The issue of equity shares with differential rights (including differential rights as to voting, dividend or otherwise) (“Differential Shares”) is governed by the provisions of Section 86 (a)(ii) of the Companies Act, 1956, together with the Companies (Issue of Share Capital with Differential Voting Rights) Rules, 2001 (“Rules”). Under the aforesaid provisions, a company limited by shares could issue Differential Shares not exceeding 25% of the total issued share capital. Differential rights would mean, in the context of voting, any equity share that is entitled to less than one vote per share (excluding the right to vote on alteration of rights attached to such shares), or more than one vote per share. A listed company may issue Differential Shares only if it has obtained the approval of its shareholders through a postal ballot.

 

The perception by market regulators that the issue of Differential Shares to a person would be detrimental to the interests of the minority shareholders, resulted in the proposal to completely abolish the right of both public and private companies to issue Differential Shares in the Companies Bill, 2008. The objective of enacting this provision appears to have been to bring about equality insofar as equity shares were concerned.

Amendment

The Companies Bill, 2008 is yet to be passed. However, SEBI has issued directions to the stock exchanges to amend the Listing Agreement to make the prohibition effective against listed companies. The direction provides for the addition of a new clause 28A, which states as follows:

 

“28A. The company agrees that it shall not issue shares in any manner which may confer on any person, superior rights as to voting or dividend vis-à-vis the rights on equity shares that are already listed.”

Implications

The amendment speaks of ‘shares’, without specifying whether the intention is to cover equity shares only. Therefore, the amendment would, on a literal interpretation, include preference shares as well, which, under the Companies Act, 1956, already have superior rights vis-à-vis dividend and liquidation than equity shares. Therefore, this amendment could have the effect of preventing listed companies from issuing preference shares as well.

 

The direction from SEBI does not clarify what is meant by ‘superior’ rights. The amendment seems to imply that a listed company cannot issue rights superior to those statutorily conferred to a holder of equity shares in accordance with the Companies Act, 1956. Therefore, a listed company may still be able to issue shares with ‘inferior’ rights with respect to voting, dividend or otherwise, if this is commercially acceptable to the investor. Further, the meaning of ‘superior’ rights could also be construed to mean and include affirmative voting rights that are often granted to investors holding such equity shares.

 

The amendment could have a direct impact on private investment in public equity (PIPE investments) in India. Private investors may be reluctant to invest in a company in the absence of protective provisions, such as affirmative voting rights and covenants that bind the target company. 

 

The direction from SEBI also does not suggest what happens to the Differential Shares already issued by some listed companies (notably Tata Motors and Pantaloon Retail). One view is that Differential Shares issued prior to this amendment will have to be rationalized, since listed companies are required to be in compliance with the Listing Agreement at all times. If this is the case, the amendment neither addresses the time nor the manner in which this rationalization should be achieved. Conversely, another view is that since the Listing Agreement governs the listed equity shares, the amendment is intended to cover only prospective issuances of Differential Shares, and will not affect issuances made before the date of the amendment.   

Conclusion

The amendment lacks clarity on the issues pointed out above, and could lead to confusing interpretations. The need of the hour is for SEBI to clarify these issues at the earliest. Considering the grim state of investments generally, it would augur well for the capital markets regulator to stimulate investment activity, rather than stifle it.

 

Further, considering the object of the abolition, the amendment is a weak move towards protection of minority shareholders in a company. Since the Companies Act provides for adequate grievance redressal mechanisms in the form of remedies against mismanagement and oppression, these may be a more appropriate way of ensuring the protection of minority interests.  Equality of voting rights may not achieve the desired minority protection objective, based on several factors most significant of which is public shareholder apathy.  We will continue to update you as this issue plays out, but for the nonce it certainly appears that shares with “superior rights” are passing into the annals of history.  

  

 

 

- Rohini Agarwal & Kartik Ganapathy

Mission and Vision


Distinctly Different

What's New


SEC imposes largest ever penalty on EY
Yes, Governance Matters.: June 30,2022
Mid-year Regulatory Update 2022: Healthcare Industry in India
Pharma & Healthcare Update : June 30,2022

Events


Webinars

Sustainable Mobility: Opportunities and Challenges
June 09,2022 - June 09,2022

This event is over. For event material please click here


Seminar

Navigating Disputes in India
February 26,2020 - February 26,2020

This event is over. For event material please click here


Round Table

Investing In Net Zero
July 14,2022 - July 14,2022

News Roundup


News Articles

Impact of Supreme Court’s new covidvaccination ruling on India’s employers
May 13,2022

Quotes

TCS case may throw spotlight on job termination in IT industry
June 23,2022

Newsletters


Yes, Governance Matters.

SEC imposes largest ever penalty on EY
June 30,2022

Pharma & Healthcare Update

Mid-year Regulatory Update 2022: Healthcare Industry in India
June 30,2022

Pharma & Healthcare Update

Doctors under watch for Professional Misconduct - National Medical Commission in action
June 29,2022

  • Disclaimer
  • Content
  • Feedback
  • Walkthrough
  • Subscribe
Nishith Desai Associates@2016 All rights reserved.