NISHITH.TV
  • Mumbai
  • Silicon Valley
  • Bengaluru
  • Singapore
  • Mumbai BKC
  • New Delhi
  • Munich
  • New York

Locations

  • Mumbai
  • Silicon Valley
  • Bengaluru
  • Singapore
  • Mumbai BKC
  • New Delhi
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Content
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • NDA in the Media
  • Areas of Service
  • Research and Articles
  • Opportunities
  • Contact
  • NDACloud
  • Client Access
  • Member Access
  • Events and Calender
  • How we perform
  • Knowledge anywhere, anytime
  • See our recent deals
  • Up to date legal developments
  • Case studies in M&A

Research and Articles

HTMLPDF

  • Research at NDA
  • Research Papers
  • Research Articles
  • Policy Papers
  • NDA Think Tanks
  • NDA Hotline
  • New Ali Gunjan
  • Japan Desk ジャパンデスク

NDA-Hotline


  • Capital Markets Hotline
  • Companies Act Series
  • Climate Change Related Legal Issues
  • Competition Law Hotline
  • Corpsec Hotline
  • Court Corner
  • Cross Examination
  • Deal Destination
  • Debt Funding in India Series
  • Dispute Resolution Hotline
  • Education Sector Hotline
  • FEMA Hotline
  • Financial Service Update
  • Food & Beverages Hotline
  • Funds Hotline
  • Gaming Law Wrap
  • GIFT City Express
  • Green Hotline
  • HR Law Hotline
  • iCe Hotline
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Hotline
  • International Trade Hotlines
  • Investment Funds: Monthly Digest
  • IP Hotline
  • IP Lab
  • Legal Update
  • Lit Corner
  • M&A Disputes Series
  • M&A Hotline
  • M&A Interactive
  • Media Hotline
  • New Publication
  • Other Hotline
  • Pharma & Healthcare Update
  • Private Client Wrap
  • Private Debt Hotline
  • Private Equity Corner
  • Real Estate Update
  • Realty Check
  • Regulatory Digest
  • Regulatory Hotline
  • Renewable Corner
  • SEZ Hotline
  • Social Sector Hotline
  • Tax Hotline
  • Technology & Tax Series
  • Technology Law Analysis
  • Telecom Hotline
  • The Startups Series
  • White Collar and Investigations Practice
  • Yes, Governance Matters.
  • Japan Desk ジャパンデスク

Gaming Law Wrap

February 11, 2016

Online Poker - Update on the Gaussian Network Case

In Gaussian Network Pvt Ltd v. Monica Lakhanpal1, a District Court in New Delhi had in 2012 opined that virtual gaming portals would come within the purview of the definition of “Common Gaming House”, as they housed instruments of gaming and are only an alternative to brick and mortar casinos, and are thus prohibited. Additionally, the court also opined that even players of such online portals would be liable to penal consequences, without going into the merits of the argument.

However, this judgment is only binding on the parties to the matter as the petitioners had filed a petition under Order 36 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (“CPC”). This matter is currently pending before the Delhi High Court2 by way of a revision petition and was heard by the court on January 21, 2016. The proceedings before the Delhi High Court were as follows:

  • Gaussian Network Pvt Ltd (“Petitioner”) and Monica Lakhanpal (“Respondent 1”) were present before the Delhi High Court. Respondent 1 who is a proposed investor in the Petitioner company, stated that it was also challenging the district court’s judgment. Initially, the standing counsel for State of NCT Delhi (“Respondent 2”) was not present.
  • The Petitioner argued that under every statute in relation to gaming, poker qualified as a game of skill. Also that poker remained a game of skill if it was played online or offline.
  • Interestingly, the State of NCT Delhi (“Respondent 2”) chose to make appearance and stated that it would be making arguments before the court.
  • During the course of the brief hearing, the junior counsel for Respondent 2 stated that it would be relying on KR Lakshmanan v. State of Tamil Nadu3 and Senior Electric Inspector v. Laxmi Narayan Chopra4. It is likely that Respondent 2 will be relying on this to argue that definition of a “Common Gaming House” as defined in various gaming legislations should be contemporaneously construed to include a virtual gaming portal.
  • A request for adjournment was made since the standing counsel for Respondent 2 was predisposed. The matter will be heard again on April 21, 2016.

The developments in this case, especially the line of arguments advanced by Respondent 2 would be interesting to follow. We will keep you posted as and when there are more updates.

 

– Mithun Verghis, Ranjana Adhikari & Gowree Gokhale

You can direct your queries or comments to the authors


1 Suit No 32 of 2012

2 CRP 119 of 2012

3 AIR 1996 SC 1153

4 AIR 1962 SC 159

Mission and Vision


Distinctly Different

What's New


How To Prioritise People: A Governance Approach To Minimise Layoffs At Startups
Yes, Governance Matters.: October 03,2023
Navigating Governance Challenges: Strengthening Non-Profit Organizations in India
Yes, Governance Matters. : September 30,2023

Events


Webinars

Impact of The New Indian Data Law on Multinational Companies Operating in India
August 22,2023 - August 22,2023

This event is over. For event material please click here


Seminar

Compliance, Governance, and Leadership
October 06,2023 - October 06,2023

Round Table

Investing In Net Zero
July 22,2022 - July 22,2022

This event is over. For event material please click here

News Roundup


News Articles

Reciprocity requirement for enforcement: A roadblock in ease of doing business?
August 24,2023

Quotes

English, Welsh lawyers have no intention of taking court work away from Indian lawyers: UK Law Society President
September 23,2023

Newsletters


Yes, Governance Matters.

How To Prioritise People: A Governance Approach To Minimise Layoffs At Startups
October 03,2023

Yes, Governance Matters.

Navigating Governance Challenges: Strengthening Non-Profit Organizations in India
September 30,2023

Social Sector Hotline

A step towards fostering transperancy under FCRA
September 29,2023

  • Disclaimer
  • Content
  • Feedback
  • Walkthrough
  • Subscribe
Nishith Desai Associates@2016 All rights reserved.