Tax Hotline
November 22, 2000
The High Court refuses to grant a stay against the CBDT Circular reaffirming India-Mauritius Tax Treaty benefits

The CBDT on April 13, 2000 had issued a circular stating that tax exemption on Capital Gains should be granted to Mauritius-based FIIs once they have been given tax residency certificate by the Mauritius Income Tax authorities. This circular was contested through a public interest litigation (PIL) by an NGO Azadi Bachao Andolan.

The Delhi High Court refused to stay the operation of the circular. However, it held that should its final ruling uphold all the writ petitions which challenge the circular, the FIIs claiming tax exemption upto that time based on the Board's order would be penalized. The final ruling is scheduled for January 31, 2001.

There were two PILs challenging the circular on the ground that CBDT had wrongly construed the residential status of the FIIs who had registered their offices in Mauritius only to gain tax benefits in India under the Tax Treaty. The third petition contends that the CBDT was violating the very fundamentals for which it was granted powers as a statutory body u/s 119 of the IT Act by defending the right of these FIIs to claim tax exemption here under the Tax Treaty.

Source: The Economic Times, November 22, 2000


Disclaimer

The contents of this hotline should not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer.

This Hotline provides general information existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is intended as a news update and Nishith Desai Associates neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on the specific facts and circumstances. This Hotline does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements.

This is not a Spam mail. You have received this mail because you have either requested for it or someone must have suggested your name. Since India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive, which states that a mail cannot be considered Spam if it contains the sender's contact information, which this mail does. In case this mail doesn't concern you, please unsubscribe from mailing list.


Tax Hotline

November 22, 2000

The High Court refuses to grant a stay against the CBDT Circular reaffirming India-Mauritius Tax Treaty benefits

The CBDT on April 13, 2000 had issued a circular stating that tax exemption on Capital Gains should be granted to Mauritius-based FIIs once they have been given tax residency certificate by the Mauritius Income Tax authorities. This circular was contested through a public interest litigation (PIL) by an NGO Azadi Bachao Andolan.

The Delhi High Court refused to stay the operation of the circular. However, it held that should its final ruling uphold all the writ petitions which challenge the circular, the FIIs claiming tax exemption upto that time based on the Board's order would be penalized. The final ruling is scheduled for January 31, 2001.

There were two PILs challenging the circular on the ground that CBDT had wrongly construed the residential status of the FIIs who had registered their offices in Mauritius only to gain tax benefits in India under the Tax Treaty. The third petition contends that the CBDT was violating the very fundamentals for which it was granted powers as a statutory body u/s 119 of the IT Act by defending the right of these FIIs to claim tax exemption here under the Tax Treaty.

Source: The Economic Times, November 22, 2000


Disclaimer

The contents of this hotline should not be construed as legal opinion. View detailed disclaimer.

This Hotline provides general information existing at the time of preparation. The Hotline is intended as a news update and Nishith Desai Associates neither assumes nor accepts any responsibility for any loss arising to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this Hotline. It is recommended that professional advice be taken based on the specific facts and circumstances. This Hotline does not substitute the need to refer to the original pronouncements.

This is not a Spam mail. You have received this mail because you have either requested for it or someone must have suggested your name. Since India has no anti-spamming law, we refer to the US directive, which states that a mail cannot be considered Spam if it contains the sender's contact information, which this mail does. In case this mail doesn't concern you, please unsubscribe from mailing list.